2017 Kia Niro
Say hybrid, and the first name that comes to most minds is “Prius”. In truth, Toyota’s original 5-door Prius hatchback has not had a competitor, likewise built on a chassis built specifically to be a hybrid, until now. Enter, the Kia Niro. A small, dedicated hybrid that also plays to the current popularity of crossover utilities. So, let’s see if Niro hits the high notes on both.
This is the 2017 Kia Niro. And, According to Kia, it’s the first of its kind; an Urban Crossover Hybrid Vehicle.
They obviously hope that adding the word crossover will spur some additional sales. But to us, the Niro is more of a squarer rival to the Pruis hatchback, as well as the Prius V, while also being reminiscent of the short-lived Kia Rondo wagon. It had such “cabinosity”, and was quite possibly a vehicle ahead of its time.
Whatever you call it, the Niro is actually a great looking vehicle that has plenty of substance as well. An important note since many subcompact crossovers are more about show than practicality.
The hybrid powertrain is a 32kW electric motor sandwiched between a 1.6-liter I4 gasoline engine and a real 6-speed dual-clutch transmission. Energy is stored in a small 1.6kWh battery beneath the rear seat. Total output is 139-horsepower and 195 lb-ft. of torque.
A plug-in version should arrive this fall.
While a dedicated hybrid, the Niro does share its platform with the Hyundai Ioniq, and the fact that it is front-wheel-drive cast more doubt on the crossover title. But then, so does the very successful Kia Soul.
So hatchback, wagon or whatever, Niro delivers good pickup with no harsh regen braking feel. The DCT operates smoothly, but engine noise can be pronounced at times.
Powertrain transitions are also fairly smooth. The only fault we found was in highway driving with cruise control engaged. Here, the Niro seems to stumble a bit as it manages both power sources as well as selects proper gearing. So, the overall experience is not quite as refined as a Prius.
The interior however, looks fantastic. Not in a flashy way, but with an understated, almost classy quality. Materials look upscale, and feel good to the touch. The seats are also more comfortable than Prius.
A power gauge replaces the tach, and our staff loved the clear TFT info display.
As for luggage space, the Niro has 19.4 cu-ft. Quite easily the rear seats fold almost flat for 54.5 cu-ft.; just short of the Sportage’s 60.1 cu-ft.
Outside, the Niro looks most like a cute yet sporty station wagon; with virtually no indications of it being a hybrid. Compared to the Soul, it is classier, and less aimed at the youngest buyers.
It also has more style than the Prius V and gets better Government Fuel Economy Ratings as well. Our Niro Touring rates 46-City, 40-Highway, and 43-Combined; we found those numbers a tad pessimistic as we averaged 47.2 miles-per-gallon of Regular without trying too hard. Kia also offers a stripped down Niro FE rated at 50-Combined, just shy of the least expensive Prius hatch.
Our Touring’s Energy Impact Score is a very good one, burning just 7.7-barrels of oil yearly with 3.4-tons of CO2 emissions.
We became very aware that fuel economy is the priority at our test track. It took us 10.1-seconds to lumber to 60, with plenty lag time before you feel any rush of power.
It was nice however, to experience real shifts, even if they were a tad slow; we much prefer that over constant CVT droning. We finished the ¼ mile in 17.7-seconds at 80 miles-per-hour.
Niro handled itself quite well through our cone course too. There was just the slightest bit of understeer when things got spirited; but for the most part, it goes where you aim it quickly.
Steering response is brisk, with a light but not over-boosted feel.
Braking from 60 averaged just 112-feet, which is quite good; as was overall stability while stopping. Pedal feel was a bit disconcerting though, as it goes right towards the floor with little resistance.
Four trim levels are available, starting at $23,785 for an FE. Top level Touring stickers for $30,545.
The 2017 Kia Niro is truly a product of its time. Part utility, part hatchback, part marketing strategy; all with a strong emphasis on high fuel economy. It’s another all-around excellent product from Kia, and if we were paying over $4.00 a gallon for gas like we were a few years ago, it would be an instant hit. As it is now, it will probably still get there; it just might take a while longer.
Specifications
- Engine: 1.6 liter I4
- Horsepower: 139
- Torque: 195 lb-ft.
- 0-60 mph: 10.1 seconds
- 1/4 mile: 17.7 seconds @ 80 mph
- EPA: 46 mpg city /40 mpg highway
- Energy Impact: 7.7 barrels of oil/yr
- CO2 Emissions: 3.4 tons/yr
2024 BMW X2
The X1’s Dynamic Alter Ego Gets Bigger and Better
It seems like everyone in the SUV world is trying to out-rugged one another. But over at BMW, they just keep doing what they do: Making stylish, high-performance sports activity vehicles, and even making them more attainable. This latest BMW X2 is proof of that.
At first glance, the 2024 BMW X2 Compact Sports Activity Coupe looks like the more dynamic platform-mate to the BMW X1. Afterall, the X1 utility is just so boring it needed the help. Weel, that’s not at all true, of course, but BMW is the brand that spearheaded the whole coupe-like SUV movement and continues to spread that theme throughout their lineup. So, hence this fast roof X2.
For its second generation, the X2 has gotten a lot bigger, a full 7.6-inches longer, which means it can now call the X1 its little brother. The roof slopes more drastically than before too, with even bigger changes in back, with the SUV-like liftgate and minimal back glass replaced with more glass set in a hatchback-style lid. Some might say the exaggerated fenders and sharp creases are a bit much, but we’re not among them. It looks great, especially with the optional M Sport Package’s 19-inch wheels, unique bumpers, and black trim.
Still, like many stylish small utilities, it is still a little hard to see out of. But that’s what cameras and a myriad of sensors are for. The X2 is clearly more upscale than before with xDrive all-wheel-drive now standard. So, no more front-wheel-drive X2s for now, though that never was a big deal to us, or to the owners of the new MINI Countryman who share this chassis.
BMW’s curved display is easily the highlight of the interior; operating with the ninth generation of iDrive technology, it blends the LED driver display into the central touchscreen. Front seats are both sporty and comfortable, and while many stylish sloped roof SUVs often sacrifice the utility part, rear seat space in the X2 is plentiful. With 25.3 cubic-feet of space, rear cargo capacity is barely less than the X1, and max capacity, at 51.7 cubic-feet, is actually more than the X1 due to the longer body.
Once it got rolling though, power did pour on pretty effectively.
This xDrive28i is the base offering, powered by a 241-horsepower 2.0-liter turbo-4 with 295 lb-ft of torque. For an upgrade, that same engine gets cranked up to deliver 312 horsepower in the M35i; both get a seven-speed DCT. We stuck with the standard 2.0-liter for testing, dialed in Sport mode, and hit the track. And while it does feel very quick on the street, whether it was turbo lag or engine tuning, there just wasn’t a real sense of urgency off the line.
Once it got rolling though, power did pour on pretty effectively, getting us to 60 in 6.2 seconds, and then stayed very consistent down the track. There was even a nice little kick of additional oomph with every gear change. So clearly not the most invigorating BMW experience we’ve had recently, but the 14.9-second quarter-mile, finished at 96 mph, is plenty quick for an entry-level ute, and there’s always the M35i.
We’d also put handling in the “upscale” category. Even with the M Sport Adaptive suspension, softer tuning produced more body roll than expected. Steering was a bit too vague and light for our taste; without the tenacious grip we expected through our handling course. On the other hand, this X2 was very stable and safe, with a more substantial feel than before. In our panic braking test, the X2’s pedal was soft until the very end of travel when it firmed up quickly. But with an average stopping distance of a scant 96 feet, they clearly did their job.
Government Fuel Economy Ratings for the xDrive28i are 24 City, 33 Highway, and 28 Combined. We averaged a quite good 31.1 mpg of Premium. That rates slightly better than average for the Energy Impact Score, 10.6 barrels of annual oil use with 5.3 tons of CO2 emissions.
Pricing starts at $42,995, which is $1,500 more than a base X1. Then a healthy step up to the M35i which starts at $52,395.
While we did appreciate the original X2 for its more stylish take on the X1, there’s a lot more to love this time. The 2024 edition of the BMW X2 is more than just a better looking X1, it’s bigger and better all around. Now, one could argue if any brand really needs three coupe-like SUVs in their portfolio. But when you’ve got the formula for success like no one else, you might as well deploy it in as many ways as you can.
Specifications
As Tested
- Engine: 2.0-liter turbo-4
- Transmission: 7-speed DCT
- Horsepower: 241
- Torque: 295 lb-ft.
- EPA: 24 City | 33 Highway | 28 Combined
- 0-60 mph: 6.2 seconds
- 1/4 Mile: 14.9 seconds at 96 mph
- Braking, 60-0 (avg): 96 feet
- MW Fuel Economy: 31.1 mpg
2024 GMC Canyon AT4X AEV Edition
Getting High With A Little Help From Some Friends
Last year, an all-new GMC Canyon arrived, taking the truck to new levels of capability and off-road performance with the debut of the AT4X. Well, something told us that story wouldn’t end there and, indeed, GMC has now teamed up with the folks at American Expedition Vehicles. So, let’s see if their dirty deeds lift the Canyon to the next level.
If you were to go by the looks of most pickup trucks and utilities in any given parking lot these days, you’d think that most everyone had to traverse some kind of barely possible trail, climb over giant boulders, and perhaps ford a few streams, just to get to the strip mall. Well, it’s doubtful that’s the case you ever did need to do such things. But, if you do, this mid-size 2024 GMC Canyon AT4X Crew Cab AEV Edition is the vehicle that can do it.
No trim packages here, the AEV additions that have been added to GMC’s most capable Canyon are quite comprehensive, enough to tack five-figures onto the AT4X’s price. They include chunky fender flares to overlap the unique 17-inch bead-lock-capable wheels, which are wearing 35-inch Goodyear Wrangler M/Ts. Next up are heavy-duty bumpers and a full-size spare placed in a vertical mount at the front of the 5-foot bed; while underneath, are ultra-high strength hot-stamped boron steel skid plates protecting the rear differential, radiator, steering gear, transmission, transfer case, and fuel tank. Finally, 1.5 inches of additional lift over the AT4X, sitting it 4.5 inches over a standard Canyon, delivering more than a foot of ground clearance.
It’s a cohesive package that also looks great, not over the top, but the same well-balanced approach we’ve seen from other partnerships between GM and American Expedition Vehicles.
So, mission accomplished in creating an extremely capable off-roader, as driving through our off-road course was more of a Sunday stroll for this truck, with the tires gripping obstacles at slow speeds and the suspension easily soaking them up at higher speeds. There are even available underbody cameras to let you monitor what you’re rolling over.
Driving through our off-road course was more of a Sunday stroll for this truck.
About the only area that didn’t get an upgrade is under the hood where you’ll still find the same 2.7-liter I4 turbo engine delivering 310 horsepower and 430 lb-ft of torque. This Turbomax sounds a bit like a Duramax at startup, but quickly smooths out and runs strong enough to pull 6,000 lbs. of trailer. Though it didn’t seem to be in the mood to pull us much at all at our test track, where it just lumbered off the line with very little urgency to 60 in 8.5 seconds. Shifting in the eight-speed automatic transmission was a little lazy, too, with a noticeable drop off in power with each gear change, but it does pick up some steam as we worked our way down the track where it clocked a respectable 16.5 seconds to finish the quarter-mile at 85 mph. For a monster off-roader it felt very stable, tracking straight and true, with very little correction required on our part.
Clearly, it would have been happier driving over the cones of our handling course rather than between them, as body roll, weight transfer, and tire rollover were all quite noticeable. But it also never felt unstable or did anything unexpected. In braking runs, we could feel the initial lack of grip from the mud terrains, but the brakes themselves were strong and fade-free. Its 115-foot stop average from 60 we rate as quite good.
Government Fuel Economy Ratings are down slightly from the AT4X, at 16 across the board for City, Highway, and Combined, though we averaged just 14.0 mpg of Regular. That’s a worse than average Energy Impact Score with use of 18.6 barrels of oil yearly and 9.3 tons of CO2 emissions.
Canyon pricing starts at $37,895, stepping up the ladder to the AT4X takes you to $55,895, and then adding the AEV Edition package brings your total starting price to $65,995.
Whether a mid-size truck is worth that amount of money depends on the amount of capability you need, or perhaps it’s more what look you’re going for. On both counts, the 2024 GMC Canyon AT4X AEV Edition is the most capable and toughest looking Canyon ever. One that is truly built to deliver.
Specifications
As Tested
- Engine: 2.7-liter I-4 Turbo
- Transmission: 8-speed auto
- Horsepower: 310
- Torque: 430 lb-ft.
- EPA: 16 City | 16 Highway | 16 Combined
- Towing Capacity: up to 6,000 lbs
- 0-60 mph: 8.5 seconds
- 1/4 Mile: 16.5 seconds at 85 mph
- Braking, 60-0: 115 feet (avg)
- MW Fuel Economy: 14.0 mpg (Regular)